AGme you would not have Clean and Green Energy. You can also place a mining station worlf this setup without a caslon source. Posted April 27, edited. The virtual boomie just needs his fix and you need a well tuned stick, and from there on, practice.

Game world refueling -

One can refuel with just a stick- that is, without a throttle, if they are patient and follow the cues. So really, how "hard" is it? How does it functionally compare to the aids that are already in place? The problem with "scalability" is the level of commiserate gripe.

If someone wanted to honestly sit down and look at the amount of complaining that takes place on this forum about tactics and employment with regards to the aircraft in question, you would find that the majority of the issues stem from voids in simple airmanship.

Too fast, too slow, not being able to read the right cues, or use the tools they have in front of them to solve basic problems in the air. This extends into all aspects.

The weaker your airmanship, the lower your performance in ACM. The less effective you are tactically. The higher the level of difficulty you have making gun runs. Your poor rejoin skills, or, when flying carrier ops, how horrible you are behind the boat. But note, it's the same old story- "don't hate the player, hate the game".

It's never the actual person who is manning the hardware's fault. And it procreates. This difficult thing gets a fix, thus this thing which is hard, yet unrelated, must have a fix, too. If you are operationally useless to Blue Air, fly Red Air, or, aircraft based from behind the Curtain.

The SuS which is the variant getting the PFM , the MiGs, the upcoming MiG none of these aircraft in default trim have AAR capability. So deal with it. Or fly short missions.

But don't quantify your lack of basic airmanship to something being difficult and needing a fix, because all that is going to do is become your crutch every time you can't do something. Yes, real pilots.

And not just any pilots, but military pilots, mostly fighter pilots. You simply can not get higher up on the skill level required than that.

People who call AAR a feat of basic flying skills really need to get out of the house and get a perspective on people, and life in general. To seriously call it basic skills in the context of a civilian, entertainment PC flight simulator simply because it's considered basic for the very elite of IRL pilots is quite frankly pathetic.

I'd call it basic but that doesn't mean it's easy at all. It's difficult, but I could give you a number of comparisons that are way more difficult, albeit those are regarded mostly as advanced skills even by real life standards. Gotta add though if you try to trim it, at the moment you're only making it harder for yourself.

IMO it's just moot to bother with AAR while the trim is completely malfunctional. You might be able to hold it straight with some degree of curve or using autopilot, but that's pretty lame. Myself, I'm trying to figure out how I could fit in a stick extension, but the space is limited.

If you open up the options menu, there are lots of options that don't have anything with hardware limitation. The sim is full of options available to scale the difficulty. Because this is not a career path but an entertainment SW that is played by people in their free time.

And for ED all these customers are valuable. That's why we have game modes, and scalable difficulty. And in this context the option for scalable AAR dificulty makes perfect sense. Yes, it is possible to learn AAR even with basic stick But I don't really see how is that a valid point Yes, so what?

For some people this is not the be all-end all. So person who is using labels, unlimited ammo and no g-effects is a worse airman then someone who is flying without assits.. so what?

The only thing that is important is if the person is enjoying his time spent playing this sim. What fix? No-one is talking about changing AAR and making it easier.

I think every sane human ticking a 'easy AAR' checkbox realize that they are using an assist. It's not the first assits available in the sim Finite fuel is easier to handle, it also has a bit of an effect on the mission. I think this misses the point. There is no reason to deal with anything because this is a simulator and not reality.

Technically, if you don't like something you can change it to however you see fit. This also isn't about needing a fix. It's no simpler than AAR being difficult at times, so why not add something to lower the difficulty for those who would like such a thing.

DCS is great, you can use it to come as close to a real pilot as you'd like to be without actually joining an air force. You can also use it to fly an indestructible plane with more missiles than something out of Ace Combat and try to take on the militaries of every nation on Earth by yourself.

Both uses are equally valid, and so is every step in between. A lot of people need to get out of the house and do other things. It gets bad when updates and things are coming out some people sit in front of their computer pressing F5 all day long.

I get that flying formation with another jet isn't the easiest thing to do, but it's not that hard either it just takes some practice. I also get that flying computer sims most people want it to be easy because they either don't want to take the time to learn it or they don't have the time to learn it.

That's why things are dumbed down. Go online and see how people fly. I know a few years back people didn't care if they lived or died, they would still press on you even if they had missiles coming at them. I haven't flown much in the last 18 months, but I can still a2a refuel, but I have been flying for years.

Another thing is how many online missions have a2a refueling or even need it? Database service failure - Resolved ×.

Forums Squadrons All Activity Leaderboard Events Rules More More Everywhere This Forum This Topic Status Updates Topics Events Members. All Activity Home English Legacy Versions DCS World 1.

x read only DCS Wishlist "Game" difficulty A2A refueling? Database service failure - Resolved. Share More sharing options Followers 0.

Yes please. Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 2 of 3. Recommended Posts. Exorcet Posted April 26, Posted April 26, Because it has to do with your basic flying. Awaiting: DCS FC Win 10 iKF 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options Rongor Posted April 26, EtherealN Posted April 26, I'll get some haters here, but Scrim Posted April 26, Posted April 26, edited.

Edited April 26, by Scrim. McBlemmen Posted April 26, Something to keep in mind, as well, is the fact that most of the DCS users who would be likely to vote yes, are not forum members.

lunaticfringe Posted April 26, Nice tone there. A real world pilot has been quoted on these forums as saying that you have to train until "your hands bleed" to learn it.

It is literally speaking one of the most complicated aspects of military aviation. biggest issue I see most having. JNASova Posted April 26, Maby YES,for the people who dont want to enter more deeply into this.

Смрт фашизму,слобода народу! Not basic flying knowledge. Scrim Posted April 27, Posted April 27, GGTharos Posted April 27, Cali Posted April 27, winz Posted April 27, Well, yes, but lets be honest, most sim pilots suck at what is irl considered basic flying ; I voted yes, this kind of scalability is imho a good thing.

The Valley AC Version Revanche for FC 3. lunaticfringe Posted April 27, Well, yes, but lets be honest, most sim pilots suck at what is irl considered basic flying ;. Posted April 27, edited. Autopilot goes offline the moment you open the tank lid.

It doesn't. If a ship runs out of fuel it can not move until refueled. A new ship class, Refueling Ship, would be required for this new idea.

The Refueling ship would have low HP, low damage, but could carry immense amounts of fuel. I hope this get implemented as I think it would make this game a lot more fun and challenging!

When a true leader's work is done and his aims fulfilled, they should say and believe 'We did this ourselves. Patton Jr. This is the slippery slope to overdetailed gaming. If you do fuel, why not ammo? Then it would be food and so on and so forth until you even have to delivery the mail for troop morale to heal.

In a way, the way ships are handled it is not much different than planes on patrol you just are not told this like you are for planes on patrol , just imagine them returning to base to heal and handle all of those details. I constantly note that players think that it is one ship or one plane while in fact that one icon represents a squadron of ships and planes OR batteries of Artillery, Tank battalions, Infantry regiment, etc.

I am less concerned about the later than the former. Space we can recover, lost time never. I get that, but ground troops can easily get any supply they need easily, whereas ships can not. Ammunition wouldn't be part of this.

When the fake daddies are curtailed, we have failed. When their roller coaster tolerance is obliterated, their education funds are taken by Kazakhstani phishers, and their candy bars distributed between the Botswana youth gangs, we have succeeded.

In no way does this sound like it makes the game more fun. In a 4x speed player map as a Coalition with hundreds of units- the LAST thing I want to worry about is ANYTHING needing to be refueled, rearmed, re-supplied General Heinz Guderian Schneller Heinz Kenny says - You've got to know when to hold 'em, Know when to fold 'em, Know when to walk away And know when to run.

You have to remember that, units aren't just the ones shown. An infantry unit includes medics and grenadiers and such, and, similar to that, naval units include several support ships.

I feel that adding something like this will just overcomplicate the game for new players. Kind regards, Donk Bytro game addict and avid CoW player. Not to be insulting but I do not think that you "get it", your comments show in fact that you do not get the points I was making at all.

First off, if you did get it you would understand the slippery slope of your idea. Otherwise you would not have said:.

Oml is this an idea that makes islands actually useful? Make HWW all in, a staple gamemode. On a hiatus click here.

Clean and Green Energy Pelmo October 28, Desired fat threshold General Clean and Green Energy. Hello guys, I found that the refeuling refueling times on the ground reefueling very long. During the games in multiplayer once landed I have to wait a very long time before they can resume the flight. So the fun goes down. You might not reset as it was before? Intel iK, 5. This was a Boutique Builder iBuypower rig.

Video

THE MOST EXPENSIVE HYBRID MAXED!!! - Jurassic World - The Game - Ep489 HD I BMI for Muscle Mass like to GGame Game world refueling the refueling countdown counts differently. Gme other countdowns are running properly, but defueling at all airports is slower than the rest. It is annoying to look at a fully prepared and boarded plane, which is still refueling, even though it has not been for a long time. Ok, if you notice closely, whenever you assign an aircraft to the gate, all times will cut by a certain amount. The only issue with that is that if you time it, the time that it goes for is the same as the original time before the aircraft is assigned.